Legal Opinion

State v. Hansbrough

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 11, 2011No. 2010AP369-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUBAUER, EJ.

¶ 1. Andre D. Hansbrough was found not guilty of first-degree intentional homicide, but guilty of felony murder, armed robbery, armed burglary and false imprisonment, all as a party to the crime. Hansbrough contends he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court failed to provide the jury with a not guilty verdict form for the lesser-included offense of felony murder. Hansbrough argues that this constituted structural error because it forced the jury to choose between first-degree intentional homicide or felony murder. Hansbrough additionally contends that he is entitled…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Renardo Carter v. Timothy DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
  4. State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API