State v. Hansbrough
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
NEUBAUER, EJ.
¶ 1. Andre D. Hansbrough was found not guilty of first-degree intentional homicide, but guilty of felony murder, armed robbery, armed burglary and false imprisonment, all as a party to the crime. Hansbrough contends he is entitled to a new trial because the trial court failed to provide the jury with a not guilty verdict form for the lesser-included offense of felony murder. Hansbrough argues that this constituted structural error because it forced the jury to choose between first-degree intentional homicide or felony murder. Hansbrough additionally contends that he is entitled…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Renardo Carter v. Timothy DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014