Legal Opinion · Dissent

Skelton v. Beavers

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 23, 1926No. 5111Published

1Dissent

Hell, J.,

dissenting.’ The Civil Code (1910), § 4637, provides as follows: “Mere inadequacy of price, though not sufficient to rescind a contract, may justify a court in refusing to decree a specific performance; so also any other fact showing the contract to be unfair, or unjust, or against good conscience.” Applying the above provisions of the code to the facts alleged in the petition, the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the action. See also Leigh v. Crump, 1 Ired. Eq. (36 N. C.) 299; Cannaday v. Shepard, 2 Jones Eq. (55 N. C.) 224; Lloyd v. Wheatly, Id. 267;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Herren v. . RichSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  2. Love v. . WelchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Ramsay v. . GheenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API