Legal Opinion

Prentiss Mercantile Co. v. Thurman

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1935No. 31783PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O'. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant by an original bill alleges that the appellees executed to it a deed of trust to secure a debt due it by them. The deed of trust, after describing certain property conveyed thereby, proceeds: “Also, any increase of all property, real or personal, that may be hereafter acquired by the parties of the first part (the appellees) by purchase or otherwise, the legal title of which under said trustee, his successors and assigns we warrant and agree forever to defend.” The bill, filed about three years after the execution of the deed of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Central Trust Co. v. KneelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Bacot v. VarnadoMississippi Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Coffey v. LandMississippi Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API