Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Holcomb

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 14, 1964No. A-10369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The application for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. Rule 483, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. So that there may be no question as to the effect •of the foregoing order, we expressly approve the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals (381 S.W.2d 347) that the trial •court erred in refusing to permit full cross-examination of the witness, Joe Compton, concerning the award made by the board ■of special commissioners in condemnation of which he was a member.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Dallas v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Great National Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Schmidt, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
  3. State v. Clara HiltonTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Warren v. DikesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Walker v. RossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API