Legal Opinion

Lumber Mineral Co. v. King

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

MOTION TO STRIKE EROM THE RECORD THE STENOGRAPHER’S TRANSCRIPT OF THE TESTIMONY. From tb© circuit court of Covington county. Hon. W. H. Hughes, Judge. The Lumber Mineral Company, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; Mrs. King, appellee, was defendant there. From a judgment in defendant’s favor plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. ■When the case reached the supreme court the appellee made the motion mentioned in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Mates, C. J.,

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

It fully appears in tbis case that appellants notified in writing, within thirty days after tbe adjournment of court, Thrapp, one of tbe stenographers taking testimony in tbe above styled oause, that a copy of tbe notes was desired for purposes of appeal. But counsel making tbe motion contend that Thrapp was not tbe “official stenographer,” and even though it appears that Thrapp was notified, still tbe statute was not complied with and tbe notes- should be stricken out. Tbis motion is accompanied by no showing that tbe “notes are incorrect in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Planters' Oil Mill v. Yazoo & M. v. R.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API