Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Russellville Steel Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MELLOY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Capitol Indemnity Corp (“Capitol”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of this contract action for Capitol’s failure to demonstrate diversity of citizenship. We reverse.
I
Capitol sued Defendants-Appellees Rus-sellville Steel Company, et al. (collectively “Russellville”), to collect over $75,000 pursuant to a general indemnity agreement. *833Defendants were citizens of Arkansas. In the complaint, Capitol alleged that it was a Wisconsin corporation, but did not allege that it maintained its primary place of business somewhere outside of Arkansas.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Joseph Osborn and Pamela Osborn, Individually and as Father and Mother and Guardians Ad Litem of Shawna Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- William F. Hagerman v. Yukon Energy Corporation, and David C. TjosvoldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Bruce Crawford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Capitol Indemnity Corporation v. Russellville Steel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004