Legal Opinion

Susnjar v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 6, 1928No. 5138PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKS, Circuit Judge.

Kot, Smarlicki, Noconj, Ulomek, Borosh and Chicowski were aliens, not entitled to enter or reside within the United States. Plaintiffs in error were jointly indicted for a violation of section 37, Cr. Code (18 USCA § 88) in that they conspired to violate section 8 of the Immigration Act of February 5, 1917 (section 144, tit. 8, U. S. C. [8 USCA § 144]), by concealing and harboring and attempting to conceal and harbor, said aliens; the alleged plan or scheme being that they would transport said alien persons in an automobile from Detroit to Cleveland, Ohio, and place them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haw Moy v. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1910
  2. Hardy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1919
  3. United States v. ScottU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1905

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. Deanna CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. United States v. Margarita Acosta De EvansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Ernesto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API