Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2010No. 34970-2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

233 P.3d 1221 (2010)

Leslie WEINSTEIN and Linda Weinstein, husband and wife, individually and as guardians ad litem for Sarah Weinstein, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross Appellants,

v.

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Prudential General Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and LM Property and Casualty Insurance, Defendants-Appellants-Cross Respondents.

No. 34970-2008.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2010 Term.

June 1, 2010.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 2010.

Anderson, Julian & Hull LLP, Boise, for appellants. Robert A. Anderson argued.

Risch Pisca, PLLC, and Goss…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API