Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 3, 1993No. CR 92-1440PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

Appellant, Charles J. Smith, appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery under the Habitual Offender’s Act. We have jurisdiction over this appeal because appellant was sentenced to sixty (60) years in prison. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(a) (2), In re: In the Matter of Rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and the Arkansas Court of Appeals, 311 Ark. Appx. (Feb. 1, 1993). Appellant’s only argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss for lack of speedy trial.

Time for purposes of speedy trial began to run on July 19, 1990, when appellant was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Thompson v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Harwood v. LoftonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Morgan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API