Holly Sugar Corp. v. Department of Revenue
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice McDONOUGH
The District Court in its opinion and order was correct. All the necessary steps to impose the tax were completed on October 25, 1989. An action of this nature must be brought within 90 days of the imposition of the tax. Section 15-1-406(2), MCA. There are no cases in Montana which have interpreted the term “imposition” relative to the imposition of a property tax.
In Soo Line Railroad Company v. Commissioner of Revenue (Minn. 1985), 377 N.W.2d 453, 458, the court, in what I feel to be a correct analysis, discussed the use of the term in the process of taxation as follows:
[Taxation] consists…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carkonen v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- Mayor of Baltimore v. PerrinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
- Fichtner v. SchillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Soo Line Railroad v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.