Legal Opinion

Crawford v. T. Smith & Son, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 1, 1935No. 33386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ODOM, Justice.

The.facts involved are that on November 27, 1933, a colored man named Peter Crawford, relator here, obtained final judgment against his employer for compensation at $20 per week for four hundred weeks under Act No. 20 of 1914, as amended. The compensation was for disability caused by an inguinal hernia. The compensation was regularly paid until January 27, 1934, when the employer petitioned the district court for a modification of the judgment as to the duration of the payments; such proceeding being authorized by section 20 of the original Compensation Act, as amended.

'The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Tampa Inter-Ocean S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Mason v. CostanzaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Eisel v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Crawford v. Tampa Interocean S. S. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boughton v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Duncan v. State, Dept. of Transp. and DevelopmentSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Lytell v. Strickland Transp. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  4. Johnson v. Continental Ins. Cos.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. Harris v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API