Moore v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
Robert Ray Moore appeals from a conviction of DWI IV and of driving on a suspended driver’s license. He raises three points on appeal. He contends the evidence was not sufficient to show he violated Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-101 (1987) because he was not proven to have been in control of a vehicle while inebriated. We hold the evidence was sufficient. Secondly, he contends records of his three prior DWI convictions should not have been admitted into evidence. We hold the records were sufficient and properly admitted. Finally, he contends the Trial Court erred in refusing to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brenk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Lukach v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Urquhart v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Glick v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Misskelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Kemp v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Larimore v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.