Legal Opinion

American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Bank of Madison

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 14, 1926No. 16954Published

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

This is a garnishment case. The defendant having dissolved the garnishment by giving bond, the garnishee conceived that it was not required to answer. The plaintiff moved for judgment against it for the amount of the judgment the plaintiff had obtained against the defendant, the principal debtor. The gar*423nishee thereupon invoked and obtained an adjudication that the dissolution of the garnishment relieved it of the duty of answering and that the garnishee “be absolved from the process.” The plaintiff duly moved to vacate this judgment. The motion was overruled and the plaintiff excepted. Thus…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Owen v. MoseleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Averback v. SpiveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Atlanta Journal v. Brunswick Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Dannenberg Co. v. Adler-May Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. Bank of MadisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API