Legal Opinion
People v. Perkins
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 2016PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*435OPINION OF THE COURT
Abdus-Salaam, J.
On this appeal, we must determine whether there was record support for the lower courts’ finding that two of the four lineups conducted were not unduly suggestive. We hold that there was not.
L
After defendant was identified as a suspect in several gunpoint robberies, the detective assigned to the case used the New York City Police Department’s photo manager system to create photo arrays with his picture. In both arrays relevant here, defendant and all five “fillers” had visible dreadlocks. Each of the four victims (AB, SP, MB and MH) chose defendant’s photo.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jehan Abdur Raheem, F/k/a John Whitaker v. Walter R. Kelly, Superintendent of Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. McBrideNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. JordanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- People v. GoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. DixsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Lamar A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. FoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.