Legal Opinion

Baltazar v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided June 30, 1982No. 13-81-094-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of possession of cocaine. In his first ground of error appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support that conviction. We agree.

On January 6, 1980, police officers in McAllen received information from an informant that appellant had been selling expensive rings which they believed to have been stolen in a recent robbery of a local jewelry store. They were told that appellant had been conducting this activity in local bars. That evening, while appellant was in the Golden Cue, a bar, officers were waiting outside. After appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Powell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Nathan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Hahn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zertuche v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Humason v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
  4. Charles Hearn v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2008
  5. Cooper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API