Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Carmon Pritchard

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 9, 1969No. 28000_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

We have concluded on the merits that oral argument is unnecessary in this case. Accordingly, we have directed the Clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties of this fact in writing. See Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court and Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir.1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.

Roy Carmon Pritchard was convicted on an indictment charging him (1) with the possession, sale and transportation of distilled spirits in containers not having tax stamps affixed thereto, in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5205(a) (2) and 5604(a) (1), and (2) with carrying on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Jack Marrin Williamson and Morris Lee Lowrey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Billy Joe Helton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  4. Alvin Grover Conner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. Willard Donnell Fahning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Charles Lidge Bolts and Joe Dee HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. James Pappas Appeal of Richard S. MischlichCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. John A. Tegzes, Susan LangstonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. United States v. EastwoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  5. State v. PetersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API