Legal Opinion

Pennock v. Lane

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRussell G. Hunt, J.

Concomitantly with the service of the subpoenas in Matter of Cantwell v. Lane (34 Misc 2d 933) the respondents, in Albany, served upon the petitioner herein, the Albany County Attorney, a subpoena to appear and testify upon the same subject, that is, the purchase of goods and supplies by the County of Albany, not at Albany as in the Canhvell and Rice cases, but at New York City. The Cantwell and Rice cases were bracketed by the Appellate Division of this court in its decision dated June 27, 1962 (16 A D 2d 1017) wherein the respondents were directed “ with due diligence to bring ” the same…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cantwell v. LaneNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pennock v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  2. Town of Oyster Bay v. Preco Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API