Legal Opinion

United States v. Douglas Hauck

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1992No. 91-1437PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Background

Defendant-appellant Douglas Hauck was a licensed real estate agent in Colorado. Together with Daniel Hoover and Richard Jorgenson, the principals of an organization called RAM Marketing, Mr. Hauck began to utilize several “no-money-down” schemes to sell properties, including “coin-vesting” with buyers who could not qualify for loans. Mr. Hauck supplied downpay ment money by collecting unusually large commissions from sellers, i.e. 20.5% to 22.-5%. After a property had been purchased and its mortgage insured by HUD, Mr. Hauck would transfer his interest…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. QayyumCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. FooteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Cynthia M. StonerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Emile RabinowitzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API