Billingsley v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
1DissentJoiner, Judge
Although I agree with the main opinion to the extent that it addresses the merits of this case, see Ankrom v. State, [Ms. CR-09-1148, Aug. 26, 2011] — So.3d(Ala.Crim.App.2011), I respectfully dissent from the main opinion’s conclusion that the term “federal court” as it is used in § 13A-11-200, Ala.Code 1975, plainly includes a military court.
Billingsley argues that the circuit court did not have “jurisdiction to convict [him] of failure to register as a sex offender under [§ ] 13A-ll-200[, Ala.Code 1975,] when the offense [that] made the basis of the failure to register conviction is a…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. WiltbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.