Legal Opinion

Brakarsh v. Brown

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallinan, J.

Motion to dismiss complaint, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, upon the ground of legal insufficiency.

This is an action by a purchaser of real estate against the seller for the specific performance of the written contract of sale entered into between them.

It appears upon the face of the complaint that on the 15th day of January, 1936, the contract was entered into; the closing date was fixed for March 2,1936; on that day the parties agreed in writing to adjourn the closing to the 23d day of March, 1936; on the 23d day of March, 1936, and at divers times thereafter, further…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hartley v. . JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Stokes v. . MacKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Woolner v. . HillNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  4. Cornwell v. . HaightNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Drake v. HodgsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Holdridge v. RobertsCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
  2. Schoen v. GrossmanNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Duke v. WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Corcoran v. TrommerNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  5. 14 Second Avenue Realty Corp. v. Anne Steven Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API