Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Baker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiana.

In 1987 the plaintiffs exercised an option to purchase property from the defendant Laurence S. Baker, pursuant to a lease agreement, approximately four months prior to the expiration of the lease (see, Rodriguez v Baker, 182 AD2d 751). Baker refused to convey the property, and the plaintiffs commenced this action. After years of litigation, during which the plaintiffs continued to make payments on a first mortgage and to pay the taxes on the property, this Court determined that the plaintiffs had properly exercised their option to purchase, and that Baker was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Sutton v. East River Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Slamow v. Del ColNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Slamow v. Del ColAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Rodriguez v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API