Commonwealth v. Wilson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of sentence for rape, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3121, and indecent assault, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 3126. Appellant contends that (1) the trial court erred in quashing a subpoena served by Appellant on the director of the Alice Paul House, (hereinafter APH), a rape crisis center located in Indiana, Pennsylvania, requesting production of their records; and (2) that the trial court erred in its instruction to the jury concerning the relative difference between rape and indecent assault. We agree with the trial court that Appellant’s second issue lacks merit, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Pittsburgh Action Against RapeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SamuelsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Millcreek Township School District v. Star Theatre, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. CodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. AultmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. HyattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.