Legal Opinion

State v. Watkins

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 4, 1997No. 88719Published

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Justice.

We have for review a decision on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

IS THE RULE IN STATE V. DAVIS, 680 So.2d 1059 (Fla.1994), REQUIRING WRITTEN REASONS FOR DEPARTURE WHEN COMBINING NON-STATE PRISON SANCTIONS, APPLICABLE UNDER THE FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.702 SENTENCING GUIDELINES (1994)?

Watkins v. State, 680 So.2d 547, 548 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

While on probation for a charge of burglary of a dwelling, Watkins pled no contest to misdemeanor battery. Watkins was then arrested for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. State v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  3. Watkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API