Legal Opinion

Harding v. Filancia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment, inter alia, directing the defendants to remove certain drains, pipes and *539structures encroaching on the plaintiffs’ property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered September 29, 1987, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, inter alia, so as to amend the ad damnum clause to seek damages.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In October 1981 the plaintiffs commenced suit, contending that their property had been damaged due to flooding caused by the defendants’ installation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Barnes v. County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Smith v. Industrial Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Mi Suk Buley v. Beacon Tex-Print, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  5. Burack v. BurackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amica Mutual Insurance v. Hart Alarm Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Selective Insurance v. Northeast Fire Protection Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. Hamilton v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2005
  4. Rothstein v. City UniversityNew York Court of Claims · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API