Legal Opinion

Belis v. Belis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 6, 1931Published

1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.

It is unnecessary to consider the contention of Koyiades that on the facts alleged no resulting trust could be found to exist as between Sultana and Eraklis (Brooks v. Fowle, 14 N. H. 248, 260; Francestown v. Deering, 41 N. H. 438, 442; Pembroke v. Allenstown, 21 N. H. 107, 111; Moore v. Moore, 38 N. H. 382, 389; Bodwell v. Nutter, 63 N. H. 446, 447; Fessenden v. Taft, 65 N. H. 39, 41; Crowley v. Crowley, 72 N. H. 241, 244-5); for if the existence of a trust as between them were conceded, it was a secret trust as to Koyiades and could not be set up here to defeat her rights as a judgment…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crowley v. CrowleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  2. Corning v. RecordsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
  3. Fessenden v. TaftSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  4. Stratton v. PutneySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885
  5. Bodwell v. NutterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1885

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API