Legal Opinion

Potts v. Hay

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 22, 1958No. 5-1551PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This is a representative suit brought by the three appellees, as officers of the Little Rock policemen’s union, to enjoin the city officials from enforcing Act 30 of 1957, it being asserted that the act is contrary to Amendment 34 to the Arkansas Constitution. William W. Leigh, as a citizen and taxpayer, filed an intervention and offered proof in defense of the statute. The chancellor held the act to be unconstitutional and issued a permanent injunction against its enforcement.

The evidence need not be recited in .detail. The city and the intervenor adduced proof to show that the declared…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norwalk Teachers' Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Cole v. White CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
  3. Beverly v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Self v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Linwood & Auburn Levee District v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Board of Trustees of the Teacher Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  2. Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. City of Fort Smith v. Arkansas State Council No. 38Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Afl-Cio v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API