Akerman v. Neel
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Proper service of the bill of exceptions must appear from an entry in dorsed upon or annexed thereto. When there is no entry whatever indorsed upon' or attached to the bill of exceptions showing service, parol statements cannot be heard in this court for the purpose of showing that service was perfected. Code, §4259; 44 Ga., 652; 45 lb., 316; 59 lb., 666; 63 15., 626.
Writ of error dismissed.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Crow v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Brantley v. McArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Ginn v. GinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Johnson v. McKelvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Smith & Co. v. Hirsch & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.