Jones v. Coal Creek Min. & Mfg. Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM ANDERSON. Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Anderson County. — Hugh Gf. Kyle, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pancher
A petition has been filed to rehear this ease.
The position taken by the petitioner, that the possession of John Bunch, while he held for one Byrd, will be limited to the inclosure so held by him for Byrd, in its effect to neutralize the possession of defendant, cannot be sustained under the facts in this case. It is upon the testimony of John Bunch alone that the defendant relies to prove its adverse possession by Jerry Bunch and John Bunch. This witness shows that, while the possession of Jerry Bunch was being held by *185him, that he (John Bnnch) was also holding under a. lease from Byrd, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hunnicutt v. PeytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- M'Clung v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1820
- Walker v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- McCammon v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Tidwell v. Van DeventerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
- Whitworth v. HutchisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
- Allis v. HuntTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.