Ridley v. First National Bank in Albuquerque
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOPEZ, Judge.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the district court pursuant to § 21-10-3, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 4, Supp. 1973).
The plaintiffs individually, and as representatives of a class of persons similarly situated, filed suit in the district court for damages against the defendants for the wrongful resale of repossessed motor vehicles. The trial court issued an order declaring that the suit proceed as a class action. From this order the defendants appeal. We reverse.
The issues presented are whether the plaintiffs have sustained their burden of proof to show the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Alice H. Rossin, for Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Southern Union Gas Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Black Hawk County v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Tauber v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- Covert v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Baber v. Williams Ford Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chisolm v. TranSouth Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- First Bank of South Dakota v. Haberer Dairy & Farm Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Romero v. Philip Morris IncorporatedNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- John Deere Leasing Co. v. FrakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
- Richardson Ford Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.