Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Pereira v. A. D. Herman Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 19, 1980Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Birns, J. P., and Lynch, J.,

concurring in part and dissenting in part in a memorandum by Lynch, J.: We dissent in part and would reverse the grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff on the issue of liability and the judgment after a jury verdict on the issue of damages and would remand for a new trial on the issues of liability and damages. In this action arising from section 240 of the Labor Law, the only evidence of the happening of the accident presented on the motion for summary judgment was the affidavit of the plaintiff who, without elaboration, stated that "a 2 X 4 timber cross…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gravenhorst v. . ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Nordlicht v. Norton Simon, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. Wood v. PiconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Royal Business Funds Corp. v. Commercial Trading Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API