Mobley v. State

Appellant raises two points in his appeal from his plea of nolo contendere to burglary and to possession of a controlled substance. In entering his plea, appellant specifically reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress certain evidence. The denial of the motion to suppress was proper, and we affirm on that point.

As a second point, appellant challenges his sentencing by a judge other than the judge who accepted his plea. In support of that point, appellant relies upon Lawley v. State, 377 So.2d 824 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), and Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(c). In…