Legal Opinion

Medick v. Bulkley

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 29, 1933No. 2339PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*644OPINION

2Per curiam

The answer having admitted the writing of the letter set up in the petition, the court determined that' upon a fair consideration of its import in its entirety it was slanderous per se. Thereupon the plaintiff was entitled to compensatory damages, full and complete. Likewise, on the state of the record, if actual malice shown, it was proper for the jury to award exemplary or punitive damages. Defensively the jury was required to determine: (1) Whether or not the libelous statements averred in the petition were true. (2) -If not true, were they maliciously made and upon the question of…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coble v. . CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. CloudOhio Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API