Legal Opinion
Taylor v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 7, 1959No. 4944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.
The appellant, Randolph Taylor, was tried and convicted of robbery (§ 41-3601 Ark. Stats.), and duly sentenced. His motion for new trial contains only these assignments:
“(1) That the verdict rendered is against law and/or the evidence.
“(2) That the Court misinstructed the Jury.
“(3) That evidence in favor of the defendant has been discovered subsequent to trial herein. That specific referred to improprieties cannot be effectively made until defendant has an opportunity to obtain a transcript of the trial of this cause from the Court stenographer.”
Assignment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Suit v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- Watkins, Broomfield & Matlock v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Keith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Ary v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gross v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961