Reckhow v. . Schanck
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from, a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second district, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of certain lands in Long Island Cit)'-, entered upon a verdict of a jury rendered at the Queens county circuit on the 15th of April, 186T. The action was ejectment.
Read the full summary
Appeal from, a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second district, affirming a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the recovery of certain lands in Long Island Cit)'-, entered upon a verdict of a jury rendered at the Queens county circuit on the 15th of April, 186T. The action was ejectment. It appeared that the plaintiff, a married woman, had a title to the premises through a conveyance from the trustees of Union College, dated March L9th, 1864. That her husband and the defendant, Hudson, were partners in the “ canning ” business, under the name of Reckhow &…
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The defendants ask a reversal of the judgment below, solely upon the ground that they were tenants of the- premises at will or by sufferance, and entitled to the statutory notice to quit accorded to tenants of that character. (1 R. S., 745, § 7.)
The title of the plaintiff and her right to the possession are not now otherwise disputed. Other objections and exceptions made and taken upon the trial are abandoned.
It is not claimed that the relation of landlord and tenant betwen the plaintiff and defendants was created or exists by convention of the parties. There is no evidence that the plaintiff…
2Cited by9 opinions
- McLeran v. BentonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Meier v. ThiemannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
- Wright v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- Tate v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
- Felt v. Methodist Educational AdvanceMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.