Davis v. Hinds Community College
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION CHAKAKHAN DAVIS PLAINTIFF vs. CIVIL ACTION No.: 3:19-CV-693-HTW-LGI HINDS COMMUNITY COLLEGE, et al DEFENDANTS ORDER BEFORE THIS COURT is plaintiff Chakakhan Davis’ (hereinafter referred to as “Davis”) Motion for Sanctions [Docket no. 79]. Davis, acting pro se, by her motion, asks this court to sanction the defendants under Rule 111 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because, according 1 (a) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest StickellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Goldsmith v. Bagby Elevator Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Linda Jackson v. Quanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Rivera v. Rochester Genesee Regional Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.