Legal Opinion

State v. Rivera

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided September 30, 2010No. 29,317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

{1} Following a bench trial, Defendant Zirachuen Rivera was convicted in metropolitan court on one count of driving while intoxicated (DWI). During the trial, Christopher Mills conducted the direct examination of one of the State’s witnesses, although Mills apparently was not licensed to practice law. Following his conviction, Defendant filed a motion for a mistrial and for a new trial, arguing the fact that an unlicensed person conducted the examination violated Defendant’s right to due process. Because the metropolitan court did not rule on Defendant’s motion, it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Jason L.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. DuranNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Las Cruces v. BetancourtNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. State v. VallesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. NevarezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. GonzalezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. State v. MirabalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. State v. RiveraNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API