Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Sanders & Thomas, Inc.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 11, 1974No. Appeal, No. 723 C.D. 1973Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Mencer:

I respectfully dissent. One reviewing the actions of the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission in this case would find it difficult to reach a result contrary to that reached by the majority here. However, I reluctantly do so, because I am of the opinion that the appellee’s only recourse was to proceed under the provisions of the Act of May 20, 1937, P. L. 728 (Act), *15872 P.S. §4651-1 et seq., and present its claim to the Board of Arbitration of Claims.

Section 4 of this Act, as amended, 72 P.S. §4651-4, provides: “The Board of Arbitration shall have jurisdiction to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Commonwealth v. ORSATTI, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Conrad v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Kreider v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Alger-Rau & Associates, Inc. v. General State AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API