Legal Opinion
Myers v. Forest Hill Gardens Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided May 18, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The primary inquiry in this suit is whether a certain written instrument is operative as an equitable assignment of the funds to which it refers. The following is a copy:
"For and in consideration of the sum of one dollar to me in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, I hereby agree to pay to Charles F. Myers, one-eighth of any and all profits to which I may be entitled and which may be payable to me, under the terms of the two agreements entered into between Horace H. Fritz and myself, covering the properties in the city of Camden, State of New Jersey, the title to which is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Pin Co. v. WrightNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
- American Pin Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. PoliakoffNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Sheeran v. SitrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
- VRG Corp. v. GKN Realty Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994