Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Karto

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 2002No. 01-877PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

On July 3, 2000, relator filed a nine-count amended disciplinary complaint against respondent, Judge Steven Ray Karto, Attorney Registration No. 0020890, who was admitted to the practice of law in the state of Ohio on November 4, 1977, and has served as the sole judge of Harrison County since April 1991.1 The amended complaint alleged that respondent had engaged in multiple violations of the Code of Judicial Conduct and the Disciplinary Rules. Respondent answered, and the matter was considered by a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. ReidOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. ClearyOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZingarelliOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. HoagueOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. AllenOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. SargeantOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GaulOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bachman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. ParkerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. SquireOhio Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API