Legal Opinion
United States v. Bobadilla
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2001No. 00-57013; D.C. No. CV-99-13314-SVWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Sergio Daniel Bobadilla (“Bobadilla”) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The district court dismissed the petition as untimely because the petition was filed more than one year after the time for seeking certiorari in the Supreme Court expired. In determining the timeliness of Bobadilla’s petition, the district court relied on United States v. Garcia, 210 F.3d 1058, 1060 (9th Cir.2000), a case decided five months after the filing of Bobadilla’s petition. Bobadilla argues that the district court’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michael Kapral v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carina Moore Topazio v. Nancy A. BerryhillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Chavez v. UttechtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Grayton v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025