Legal Opinion

Grant v. Miller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 26, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Hannah Grant against Barney Miller. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered by direction of the court after a trial without a jury, defendant appeals. Reversed, and complaint dismissed.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

The action is brought to recover the value of a fur coat, delivered by plaintiff to defendant for repair, which defendant refused and neglected to return to plaintiff.

[1, 2] The answer denies negligence and sets up that defendant was deprived of possession of the coat by a robbery, without fault on the part of the defendant. On the trial defendant introduced proof fully *830-establishing the fact of the loss of the coat by robbery. No evidence was introduced by plaintiff disproving the robbery or showing any negligence on the part of the defendant; but plaintiff endeavored to meet this defense by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Allen v. Fulton Motor Car Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Carll v. GoldbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. W. N. Stevenson & Co. v. HartmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  2. Neilson v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API