Jordan v. Hagewood
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
The plaintiff appeals from her judgment in a personal injury automobile action based on a verdict which is allegedly inadequate because of contended errors in the trial.
1. "1. Although it is no longer necessary to use expert testimony to prove that bills incurred for medical, hospital, and drugs are reasonable and necessary, it is still required that it be shown such expenses were incurred in connection with the treatment of the injury, *959disease or disability involved in the subject of litigation at the trial, which may be done by lay testimony. Code Ann. § 38-706.1 (Ga. L. 1970,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lester v. S. J. Alexander, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tucker Nursing Center, Inc. v. MosbyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- CFUS Properties, Inc. v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Monson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. NowellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.