Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Finch

Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco

Decided December 29, 1893No. 12,183Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

Halsted & Company, undertakers, at the request of Mark Parish, who engaged them so to do, buried deceased, paying all the funeral expenses; subsequently Mark Parish was appointed the administrator of the estate of Philetus Finch, deceased, and duly qualified and entered upon the discharge of his duties as such administrator; at the *295request of said administrator Halsted & Company made out their claim for said funeral expenses against the decedent’s estate and delivered the same to said Parish, who forwarded the same to Michigan and received the money to pay the same. The claim of Halsted &…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fallon v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. In re the Estate of OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. OlveraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Watson v. San Francisco & Humboldt Bay RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API