Legal Opinion
Foster v. Adams and Associates, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 6, 2020No. 3:18-cv-02723Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CAROL FOSTER, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02723-JSC 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR 11 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 ADAMS AND ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 102 & 137 Defendants. 13 14 Carol Foster and Theo Foreman bring a class action under the Employee Retirement 15 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. §§ 1001, et seq., on behalf of participants and 16 beneficiaries of the Adams and Associates Employee Stock Ownership Plan. Plaintiffs allege that 17 Adams and Associates, Inc., Roy A. Adams,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Nissan Fire & Marine Insurance Company, Ltd v. Fritz Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.