Legal Opinion
Scott v. Shalala
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 24, 1995No. Civ. 93-1809PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SPORKIN, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff, Cleopatric Scott, seeks judicial review pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and § 1383(c)(3), of the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying her claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401-433, 1381-1383c. In the alternative, Plaintiff seeks to have the case remanded for further proceedings. Defendant moves the Court pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rosado v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Walker G. Grant v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Rose E. Brown v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jeffries v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Elbert v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
- Hynes v. MassanariDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Jeffries v. AstrueDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010