King v. Swartz Manufacturing Co.
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Bill, answer, replication and proofs. C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., June T., 1921, No. 3488, in Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
Stern, J.,
This is a bill in equity to enjoin the use of words and pictures which are alleged to be infringements upon trade-marks previously appropriated by the complainant. On bill, answer, replication and proofs the court adopts as its findings of fact and conclusions of law the plaintiff’s and defendant’s requests for findings of fact and conclusions of law as affirmed or modified by the chancellor, and which are sufficiently complete to obviate the necessity of additional findings being made.
*183Eliminating the question of any contested patent rights as to the device itself, the facts…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Worden v. California Fig Syrup Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Fetridge v. WellsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Popham v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Heinz v. Lutz Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
- E. T. Fraim Lock Co. v. ShimerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.