Cargill Elevator Co. v. D. Sullivan & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Both plaintiff and defendant are corporations. Plaintiff is engaged in the business of buying and selling grain on the Duluth board of trade and in shipping grain by boat over the Great Lakes. Defendant is engaged in the business of securing vessels for shippers and cargoes for vessels. It owns three vessels, but its business .includes securing other vessels for shippers and cargoes for other vessels. The transactions out of which this controversy arose were conducted on the part of plaintiff by Harley L. Flood and on the part of defendant by Alastair Guthrie. On November 15, 1924,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rowell v. OlesonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- De Remer v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Wm. Lindeke Land Co. v. LevySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Sanders v. MunsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
- Horan v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Standard Const. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1950
- Haas v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Paynesville Farmers Union Oil Co. v. Ever Ready Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985