Legal Opinion

Eimer v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 8, 1938Published

1Opinion of the Court

Sullivan, Judge:

Tbe merchandise involved in this protest is invoiced as “Glass Wool.” The official sample consists of white glossy fibers resembling fine wool in appearance.

The examiner’s red-ink notation on the invoice over this item of “glass wool” is “Lab. Glassware, 85% 218,” indicating it was classified as—

Biological, chemical, metallurgical, pharmaceutical, and surgical articles and utensils of all kinds, including all scientific articles, and utensils, whether used for experimental purpose in hospitals, laboratories, schools or universities, colleges, or otherwise * * * finished or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fensterer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API