Legal Opinion

Gilcrest v. Bowen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1933No. 7,073PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews

The plaintiffs, F. H. and Clementine Y. Gilcrest, instituted suit to enjoin the defendant R. E. Bowen from interfering with their use of water from Antelope Creek, a tributary of Judith River. By pleading and proof they established their right to the use of 160 miner’s inches of such water by appropriation made on October 20, 1883.

|; The defendant answered claiming a right, prior in time and use, by mesne conveyance from one John Croke, who is alleged to have appropriated 200 miner’s inches of the waters of Antelope Creek on June 9, 1882.

Issue being joined, a trial was had which resulted in a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Escallier v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Tucker v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. St. Onge v. BlakelyMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Toohey v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McDonald v. LannenMontana Supreme Court · 1897

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Langston v. CurrieMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Smith v. GunnissMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Frisbee v. CoburnMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Nadeau v. Texas CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API