Public Citizen Health Research Group v. United States Department of Labor
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
(* Dismissed-See Court’s Order dated 12/13/06). (** Dismissed-See Court’s Order dated 06/26/07).
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
RENDELL, Circuit Judge.
Petitioners challenge a standard promulgated by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) to regulate the occupational exposure of workers to hexavalent chromium (“Cr(VI)”), a toxic substance. Public Citizen Health Research Group and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Worker’s International Union, (collectively “HRG”) join in arguing that OSHA violated its statutory mandate in adopting a standard that under-regulates Cr(VI) exposure. The Edison Electric Institute (“EEI”)…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. American Petroleum InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Industrial Union Department, Afl-Cio v. James D. Hodgson, Secretary, Department of Labor, Environmentaldefense Fund, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Building and Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, Asbestos Institute, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Intervenors. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. United States Department of Labor, Asbestos Institute, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Intervenors. Asbestos Information Association/north America, Etc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Asbestos Institute, Building and Construction Trades Department, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Intervenors. Asbestos Information Association/north America Etc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Asbestos Institute, Building and Construction Trades Department, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Allstates Refractory Contractors v. Julie SuCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Ass'n v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water v. Natural Resources Defense CounCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- ARIZONA CATTLE GROWERS'ASS'N v. SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.